Glossary · Enterprise blockchain

Private blockchain

Published 23 May 2025 · Updated 2 Nov 2026 · 13 min read

A private blockchain is a blockchain where one organization controls who may write and validate records, and usually who may read them. A consortium chain shares control among several known organizations. These labels describe governance and access, not guaranteed privacy, security, lower costs or better performance than a public network.

  • Private describes who reads and permissioned who writes, so these are separate choices.
  • NIST and Wüst and Gervais both direct single-writer setups to a database.
  • Operators can replace blocks and change rules, shifting trust from open validation to those in control.

Who runs a private blockchain

Start with two questions about a distributed ledger: who may add records, and who may look at them. One organization or a consortium can control write access and read access separately. A public permissioned network approves writers but allows public reading. A permissionless network needs no such approval. The permissioned ledger entry explains permissions, identity and privacy mechanics across Fabric, Corda, Besu and Canton. The public blockchain entry covers open reading. Neither question alone identifies who can change network rules.

Figure 1 · Ten networks, quoted from sourcesWho writes and who readsPick a network to see its access model, operator, status and the source wording behind its position.
Network
Who validates and who reads
Anyone can readOnly members readAnyone can validatePublic permissionlessBitcoin, EthereumAnyone validates, members readNone of the networks shownApproved validatorsPublic permissionedAlastria Red BPrivate permissionedCanton Network, Kinexys by J.P. Morgan, HSBC deposit tokens, DTCC Besu network, WFP Building Blocks, Contour, we.trade
BitcoinAnyone
Who runs it
Anyone who runs a node or mines
Who reads
Anyone
Status
Live since January 2009
“In a permissionless blockchain network anyone can read and write to the blockchain without authorization.”NIST IR 8202, 2018
EthereumAnyone
Who runs it
Anyone who stakes and runs a validator
Who reads
Anyone
Status
Live since July 2015
“In a permissionless blockchain, such as Bitcoin or Ethereum, anyone can be a user or run a node.”Cachin and Vukolić, IBM Research, 2017
Alastria Red BApproved partners
Who runs it
Alastria partners: 5 validator nodes and 65 regular nodes in its node directory
Who reads
Approved nodes
Status
Live, node directory updated October 2026
“Alastria red B Network is a public-permissioned Blockchain network that uses the Hyperledger BESU technology, IBFT 2.0 consensus algorithm, and it's managed by Alastria partners.”Alastria node README
Canton NetworkApproved operators
Who runs it
Super Validators run the Global Synchronizer. Validators join with approval
Who reads
Only the stakeholders of each transaction
Status
Live since July 2024
“Canton distinctly balances the decentralization of public blockchain with the privacy and controls required for financial markets.”canton.network. Its docs add: Canton nodes store only their parties' data
Kinexys by J.P. MorganOne organization
Who runs it
One bank
Who reads
Set by the operator
Status
Live, renamed from Onyx in November 2024
“The Kinexys private-permissioned asset platform.”J.P. Morgan
HSBC deposit tokensOne organization
Who runs it
One bank
Who reads
Set by the operator
Status
Live in six markets
“Built on a private HSBC blockchain.”HSBC Tokenised Deposit Service
DTCC Besu networkOne organization
Who runs it
One market infrastructure
Who reads
Set by the operator
Status
Live since 28 October 2026, next to Canton
“DTCC's private Besu network.”DTCC, October 2026
WFP Building BlocksOne organization
Who runs it
One UN agency
Who reads
Set by the operator
Status
Described by the BIS in June 2018
“It is also centrally controlled by the World Food Programme.”BIS Annual Economic Report 2018
ContourA consortium
Who runs it
9 bank investors and 22 bank members, on Corda
Who reads
The banks in each trade
Status
Closed on 30 November 2023, revived in 2024, sold in 2025
“Contour is a global network of banks, corporates and trade partners.”ICC, October 2023
we.tradeA consortium
Who runs it
16 banks in 15 countries, on Hyperledger Fabric
Who reads
The banks on the platform
Status
Wound up in June 2022
“we.trade recruited IBM as its engineering partner to build a solution using Hyperledger Fabric.”LF Decentralized Trust blog, 2021

Bitcoin, live since January 2009, and Ethereum, live since July 2015, are public permissionless networks. Anyone can run a node, validate and read.

Alastria Red B calls itself public permissioned and is managed by Alastria partners. Its node README says every node needs acceptance before use.

Canton calls itself public, approves validator entry and keeps each transaction's records with its stakeholders, rather than broadcasting every record.

Source descriptions give Kinexys, HSBC, DTCC's Besu network and the World Food Programme one operator controlling read access.

Several known organizations share control in a consortium. Contour on Corda closed in November 2023, and Fabric-based we.trade wound up in June 2022.

Each placement follows the network's own words or a primary source, read on 2 November 2026.

Definitions vary. Buterin's August 2015 account gives fully private blockchains one owner. His consortium example needs ten of 15 banks to sign blocks. Cachin and Vukolić's 2017 private-chain definition uses one single trust domain. NIST's October 2018 account recognizes an owner or consortium. The World Bank's 2017 framework separates reading from writing. Private and permissioned are therefore not synonyms. Alastria Red B calls itself public permissioned. Canton calls itself public, while transaction records stay with stakeholders.

The September 2026 ethereum.org networks page uses private to mean isolated, not protected or secure. Any full node on a private blockchain can pass its copy onward, as Besu's documentation warns. Hybrid designs lack a standards-body definition. AWS describes them as combinations of private and public elements. That vendor wording does not establish who controls each part or which records are visible. Those choices still need an explicit description for each design. A hybrid design's public component need not expose every confidential record.

What private blockchain operators can change

Changing rules, stopping blocks, replacing history and sharing records are different powers. A private blockchain operator may hold all four. Byzantine fault tolerance limits certain failures, not governance authority. Fabric defaults put governance with a majority of admins. The figure separates voting rules from disruption thresholds and distinguishes member counts from Ethereum's stake-based finality.

Figure 2 · Thresholds from the docs, page team calculationWho can exercise each powerChoose a setup and adjust consortium membership to see voting thresholds, disruption points, history controls and data access.
Setup
Change the rules or the member list1 of 1One partyThe company changes the rules and decides who joins.Buterin, 2015: the operator “can easily, if desired, change the rules of a blockchain, revert transactions, modify balances”
Stop new blocks1 of 1One partyThe company stops its own nodes and the chain stops.Cachin and Vukolić: a private chain is run “within one single trust domain”
Rewrite or fork history1 of 1One partyThe company can replace blocks and revert transactions.NIST IR 8202: blocks “can be replaced through legitimate methods if desired by the owner or consortium”
Read and pass on data1 of 1One partyThe company decides who reads and can pass on any record.Buterin, 2015: “Read permissions may be public or restricted to an arbitrary extent”
Change the rules or the member list3 of 5MajorityMember admins approve channel and membership changes by majority.Fabric policies default to the “majority of admins”
Stop new blocks3 of 5Majority3 ordering nodes offline leave no majority, so new blocks stop.Fabric docs: “If you have five nodes in a channel, you can lose two nodes”
Rewrite or fork historyAny liarNo protectionRaft trusts the leader. Members acting together can replace blocks.Raft is “not suitable to be deployed in such a harsh adversary model”
Read and pass on data1 of 5Any one memberEach member keeps a copy and can pass it on.Besu docs: nodes “cannot prevent the bad actor from allowing access to the chain”
Change the rules or the member list4 of 7MajorityValidators vote validators in and out by majority.QBFT: “A majority of validators must execute the call”
Stop new blocks3 of 7More than a thirdA block needs 5 of 7 signatures, so 3 offline validators stop new blocks.BFT rule: a block needs two thirds of validators, rounded up
Rewrite or fork history3 of 7More than a third3 dishonest validators can finalize two conflicting blocks, 5 can finalize anything alone.BFT rule: a block needs two thirds of validators, rounded up
Read and pass on data1 of 7Any one memberEach member keeps a copy and can pass it on.Besu docs: nodes “cannot prevent the bad actor from allowing access to the chain”
Change the rules or the member list9 of 13Two thirdsSuper Validator nodes vote on governance actions. The DSO page shows a threshold of 9.Splice DSO rules: ceil((n + f + 1) / 2) votes, 9 of 13 on the DSO page
Stop new blocksOver 1/3More than a thirdBFT ordering keeps going while fewer than a third of orderer nodes fail.Canton: “Fewer than one-third of the total BFT orderer nodes may simultaneously exhibit Byzantine failures”
Rewrite or fork historyOver 1/3More than a thirdFewer than a third of orderer nodes misbehaving cannot reorder or fork the ledger.Canton: “Fewer than one-third of the total BFT orderer nodes may simultaneously exhibit Byzantine failures”
Read and pass on dataStakeholdersStakeholders onlyEach transaction is stored only by the nodes of its stakeholders.Canton docs: “Canton nodes store only their parties' data”
Change the rules or the member listNo voteNo single groupUpgrades ship as hard forks that each node operator chooses to run.ethereum.org: upgrades “are usually agreed upon ahead of time”, the DAO fork of 2016 split off Ethereum Classic
Stop new blocksOver 1/3 of stakeA third of stakeFinality stops if more than a third of staked ETH is offline. Blocks keep coming.ethereum.org: finality needs “at least two-thirds of the total staked ETH”
Rewrite or fork history1/3 of stakeCostlyReverting a finalized block burns at least a third of all staked ETH.ethereum.org: reverting a finalized block costs “at least one-third of the total supply of staked ETH”
Read and pass on dataAnyoneEveryoneEvery record is public.NIST IR 8202: in a permissionless network “anyone can read”

One company can change rules, stop blocks, replace history and pass on records without another member's approval.

For five members, Fabric defaults require three admins for rule changes. Three offline orderers stop blocks. Raft offers no protection against lying nodes.

Two thirds of validators, rounded up, finalize blocks. Three offline validators halt a seven-validator network, and one member can disclose data.

The 2 November 2026 DSO rules require nine of 13 Super Validator nodes for governance. Only stakeholders' nodes store each transaction.

No member vote governs upgrades. Finality needs at least two thirds of staked ETH, and anyone can read every record.

Thresholds come from Fabric, Besu, Canton and ethereum.org documentation. Member counts are calculated by the page team.

Besu's QBFT uses proof of authority, but control depends on who holds keys, not just voting rules. In March 2022, five of nine Ronin validator keys were compromised, with four held by one company. Ronin then raised its validator threshold from five to eight. In October 2022, BNB Smart Chain validators halted the chain, and a client release blacklisted attacker addresses. In March 2023, Hedera operators disabled mainnet proxies after an exploit. Council node operators signed code updates, and access resumed on 11 March 2023.

Private blockchain or database: when each fits

Record storage alone does not justify a chain. Test whether several organizations need to change shared state without accepting one party's control. The blockchain decision guide provides interactive questions from Wüst and Gervais, rather than assuming a private blockchain is the answer. Neither framework recommends a one-company chain.

NIST's October 2018 DHS chart and Wüst and Gervais's 2018 questions direct single writers to databases. An always-online trusted third party can take writes. A private blockchain serves writers who do not trust each other. In June 2018 the BIS said DLT "can be efficient in niche settings". The ECB's April 2016 paper said redundant storage does not drive back-office costs. The Bank of Canada's 2017 Jasper report said current DLT "may not provide an overall net benefit", and warned that restricted designs could reduce resilience.

One-operator cases need careful comparisons. The BIS's June 2018 account describes the World Food Programme's Building Blocks as a centrally controlled, permissioned Ethereum system. Its reported transaction savings of about 98% compare with banks, not a database. Accenture's November 2022 ASX review found that the ledger added undue complexity for resilience. EDPB guidance adopted in July 2026 generally advises against storing personal data on-chain. Where blockchain is used, it favors permissioned systems. That preference is not a claim that a private blockchain makes personal data safe.

The track record of enterprise networks

The timeline follows 14 enterprise projects from 2015 to November 2026. Colors show outcomes, not platform quality. The live set mixes one-company platforms with applications on public networks including Canton and Base. Read each entry's purpose, governance and stated outcome. Production volumes, prototype tests and company survival answer different questions about whether a network works for its participants. An operating network is not proof of a universal business case.

Figure 3 · 14 networks, 2015 to 2026Enterprise networks and their outcomesFilter by outcome, then select a network to see its purpose, operators, platform, dates and the reason reported for its outcome.
Show
From start to outcomeClosed or insolventChanged courseLive in 2026PrototypeLater event
2015201720192021202320252027
B3iClosed or insolvent
What it did
Insurance and reinsurance
Who ran it
B3i Services AG, backed by more than twenty insurers
Platform
Hyperledger Fabric, then Corda from June 2018
Outcome
Insolvent, July 2022
“ceased activities and filed for insolvency following unsuccessful funding rounds”Insurance Journal, 29 July 2022
we.tradeClosed or insolvent
What it did
Trade finance
Who ran it
Bank consortium, 16 banks in 15 countries by 2021
Platform
Hyperledger Fabric
Outcome
Wound up, June 2022
“is winding up its operations and has proposed PwC as its liquidator”ICC Digital Library, 15 June 2022
Marco PoloClosed or insolvent
What it did
Trade finance
Who ran it
Marco Polo Network Operations, more than 30 bank members at one stage
Platform
R3 Corda
Outcome
Provisional liquidators, February 2023
“has liabilities of more than €5.2 million”The Irish Times, 22 February 2023
TradeLensClosed or insolvent
What it did
Shipping data
Who ran it
Maersk and IBM
Platform
Hyperledger Fabric
Outcome
Discontinued, offline by the end of Q1 2023
“the need for full global industry collaboration has not been achieved”Maersk, 29 November 2022
ContourChanged course
What it did
Letters of credit
Who ran it
9 bank investors and 22 bank members
Platform
R3 Corda
Outcome
Closed November 2023, revived February 2024, sold to XDC Ventures October 2025
“Contour has been unable to raise sufficient funds from its bank shareholders to continue to sustain itself”ICC Digital Library, 31 October 2023
ASX CHESS replacementChanged course
What it did
Equities clearing and settlement
Who ran it
ASX alone, vendor Digital Asset
Platform
Daml
Outcome
Paused November 2022, A$245 to 255 million charge, TCS BaNCS chosen November 2023
“the path we were on will not meet ASX's and the market's high standards”ASX chair, 17 November 2022
Kinexys by J.P. MorganLive in 2026
What it did
Payments and deposit tokens
Who ran it
J.P. Morgan
Platform
Private-permissioned platform, JPMD on Base, Canton rollout in 2026
Outcome
Live, more than $7 billion average daily volume in 2025
“the Kinexys private-permissioned asset platform”J.P. Morgan, 2026
PartiorLive in 2026
What it did
Multi-bank settlement
Who ran it
Founded by J.P. Morgan, DBS and Temasek
Platform
Not stated on its site
Outcome
Live
“the production-live, multi-bank blockchain settlement network”Partior, 2026
Canton NetworkLive in 2026
What it did
Network for regulated markets
Who ran it
Super Validators, governed through the Canton Foundation
Platform
Canton and Daml
Outcome
Live, Global Synchronizer since 1 July 2024
“The Global Synchronizer is going live after ten years of technological development”Canton Network, 1 July 2024
Swift shared ledgerPrototype
What it did
24/7 cross-border payments
Who ran it
Swift and more than 30 financial institutions
Platform
A conceptual prototype by Consensys
Outcome
Prototype, announced September 2025
“Swift will work at pace to complete the prototype in phase one”Swift, 29 September 2025
Project AgoráPrototype
What it did
Tokenized reserves and deposits
Who ran it
BIS Innovation Hub, 8 central banks, more than 40 firms
Platform
Prototype
Outcome
Real-value test in July 2026, ongoing
“Project Agorá is not about building a finished product but rather has delivered a prototype”BIS, 2026
DTCC Tokenization ServiceLive in 2026
What it did
Tokens for assets held at DTC
Who ran it
DTCC, 20 DTC Participants signed
Platform
Canton and DTCC's private Besu network
Outcome
Live since 28 October 2026
“This is only the beginning of DTCC's ultimate goal to build the Web3 ecosystem of the future”DTCC, 28 October 2026
Broadridge DLRLive in 2026
What it did
Repo, including intraday repo
Who ran it
Broadridge
Platform
An application on the Canton Network
Outcome
$7.5 trillion in September 2026, $359 billion a business day
“processed an average of $359 billion in daily repo transactions during September”Broadridge, 8 October 2026
HSBC Tokenised Deposit ServiceLive in 2026
What it did
Deposit tokens
Who ran it
HSBC
Platform
A private HSBC blockchain
Outcome
Live in six markets
“Built on a private HSBC blockchain”HSBC, 2026

B3i, we.trade, Marco Polo and TradeLens operated for five to six calendar years before closing in 2022 or 2023 for funding or adoption reasons.

Contour was revived in February 2024 and sold in October 2025. ASX chose TCS BaNCS, a product-based CHESS replacement, in November 2023.

Six networks are live in November 2026. Several connect private and public networks, rather than staying within one access model.

Swift's September 2025 shared-ledger announcement describes a prototype. Project Agorá's July 2026 real-value test does not make it a finished product.

Dates and stated reasons follow operator announcements and press reports, read on 2 November 2026.

TradeLens ran on Hyperledger Fabric. Maersk and IBM's November 2022 closure announcement said "the need for full global industry collaboration has not been achieved". The bank-backed we.trade wound up in June 2022 after its shareholders "pulled the plug". Marco Polo entered provisional liquidation in February 2023. B3i cited "unsuccessful funding rounds" in July 2022. Contour's November 2023 closure followed insufficient shareholder funding. ASX's Daml project paused in November 2022 over design challenges, with an A$245 to 255 million pretax charge. None involved security breaches.

In November 2026, Kinexys, multi-bank Partior and HSBC's deposit service are live. JPMD, J.P. Morgan's deposit token, launched on Base in November 2025, with Canton expansion phased through 2026. Broadridge DLR processed $7.5 trillion in September 2026 on Canton. DTCC's Tokenization Service launched on 28 October 2026 across Canton and its private Besu network. Swift announced a shared-ledger prototype in September 2025. Project Agorá tested real value in July 2026, but remains a prototype. These are different stages, not equivalent adoption claims.

What a private blockchain costs to run

The table uses prices read on 2 November 2026, with monthly calculations based on 720 hours. It excludes staff, audits, governance and legal work. The $625 Kaleido example excludes storage and support too. Private blockchain infrastructure charges and public transaction fees cover different things, so the rows are not workload-matched alternatives.

OptionPrice read on 2 November 2026Per monthBasis
AWS Managed Blockchain, Fabric, one production memberPrice read on 2 November 2026$1.93 an hour (AWS example)Per month$1,389.60Basis720 hours, existing customers only
AWS Managed Blockchain, Fabric, two-member test networkPrice read on 2 November 2026$0.676 an hour (AWS example)Per month$486.72Basis720 hours, existing customers only
Kaleido Business, small Fabric peer, orderer and CAPrice read on 2 November 2026$0.80 an hour plus $49 membershipPer month$625.00BasisBefore storage and support
AWS Managed Blockchain, Ethereum, two nodesPrice read on 2 November 2026AWS examplePer month$346Basis300 GB each, 30 million requests, existing customers only
Ethereum, 1 million ETH transfersPrice read on 2 November 2026About $0.0025 eachPer monthAbout $2,495Basis0.052 gwei, ETH at $2,284.78, 11:58 UTC
Base, 1 million ERC-20 transfersPrice read on 2 November 2026About $0.001 each (rounded)Per monthAbout $1,000BasisBaseScan reading, 00:52 UTC

Azure Blockchain Service retired in September 2021. IBM Blockchain Platform support ended in April 2023. IBM directed customers to its Hyperledger Fabric support. Amazon Managed Blockchain stopped accepting new customers on 29 October 2026, with access ending in September 2027. AWS lists "an AWS database" among Fabric migration routes. Its guidance says network state and identities are rebuilt, not copied. Oracle Blockchain Platform and Kaleido remain offered in November 2026. A managed private blockchain therefore needs an exit plan, not just an initial hosting quote.

At the November 2026 readings, private charges are fixed per member, while public fees scale with transfers. Neither column prices the people who maintain the process. Staff, governance and legal work sit outside infrastructure quotes, alongside audits. The write-offs and failed funding rounds above show why a hosting price cannot stand in for total exposure. No source reviewed supplies a like-for-like comparison for the same workload. A private blockchain cost assessment must keep those gaps visible. Public gas prices also change after each quoted reading.

Private blockchain risks to account for

The same controls that make membership manageable create dependencies. Assess a private blockchain through its administrators, member incentives and information holders, not just its consensus algorithm. These risks concern the operating arrangement, including who can act alone and what happens when support ends.

Rewritable rules and history

Ledger immutability is conditional. Operators can change rules, and NIST's October 2018 guidance describes legitimate replacement of any number of blocks by an owner or consortium.

Concentrated keys and collusion

Ronin's March 2022 breach illustrates why counting validators alone misses shared key control. Members acting together can also undermine the separation that voting thresholds appear to provide.

Copies can escape

Known identities do not prevent disclosure. Any member holding a private blockchain copy can pass it on, even when other members reject that member's future writes.

Access authority under attack

The World Bank's 2017 note identifies the central access authority as a potential cyberattack target. Permissioned membership places trust in whoever controls admission to the network.

Service support can end

A hosting contract does not guarantee lasting support. Amazon Managed Blockchain's 29 October 2026 closure to new customers highlights migration planning for existing private blockchain members. AWS migrations rebuild state and identities.

Members can withdraw

A consortium needs continuing participation and funding. B3i's July 2022 insolvency after unsuccessful funding rounds shows that technical operation does not ensure an organization can keep financing its network.

Decisions before building a private blockchain

We start with the shared process and its decision rights, not a default platform. PixelPlex is a software engineering company founded in 2007 and building in blockchain since 2013. On Canton, we are a validator operator and run our own production infrastructure. Our private blockchain development work considers who writes, who governs and what an exit requires. The following decisions help describe a private blockchain before selecting its technology.

PixelPlex case icon

For Kazakhtelecom's digital contract platform, we chose Quorum, with its modified Ethereum core and Solidity support. Quorum's modified consensus supports internal, non-public projects. Its private and public data separation allowed users outside Kazakhtelecom to access and verify public data. The case describes private smart contracts storing information on the blockchain, rather than making every record available to every reader.

  1. Writers and shared state

    Identify which organizations must contribute records and where their interests differ. We treat a single-writer requirement as a reason to examine a database first.
  2. Votes and node operation

    Define who runs each node and approves upgrades. In consortium blockchain development, voting rights can be distributed so no member decides for everyone under agreed governance rules.
  3. Reading and disclosure

    Specify what every member may read and retain. We distinguish access approval from privacy, including the consequences when an authorized recipient shares information beyond the intended audience.
  4. Consensus and failure limits

    Set acceptable outages and dishonest-member assumptions before choosing a consensus mechanism. Fabric, Quorum and Corda answer different needs, so we do not assume one default platform for all projects.
  5. Public connections and exits

    Define vendor exit requirements before deployment. In hybrid blockchain development, confidential records can stay inside permissioned nodes while only cryptographic hashes or attestations reach public networks.

Discuss the boundaries of your private blockchain

We can review the proposed writers, operator responsibilities, member governance and exit requirements before you decide whether a chain belongs in the design.

Discuss your requirements

Private blockchain FAQ

What is a private blockchain in simple terms?

A private blockchain is a blockchain run by one organization, which decides who may write and validate records and usually who may read them. When several known organizations share that control, sources call it a consortium chain. Neither label by itself says that the data is protected or that the chain is secure.

How does a private blockchain differ from a public blockchain?

A public blockchain allows anyone to read its records, while a private blockchain limits access under its governance rules. NIST's October 2018 overview describes permissioned consensus as usually faster and less computationally expensive. That is not a general scalability guarantee. Approved participation replaces open validation with trust in selected organizations. Public permissioned networks show that public reading does not require permissionless writing.

How do private blockchains differ from consortium blockchains?

A private blockchain has one controlling organization, while a consortium blockchain has several known organizations sharing control. Buterin's August 2015 account calls consortium chains partially decentralized. Membership alone does not establish equal power. Governance determines which organizations approve changes, and the member list may differ from the group that actually operates the validating infrastructure. Reading can remain restricted or be open to the public.

Is a private blockchain the same as a permissioned ledger?

Not exactly. A permissioned ledger requires authorization to write or validate, while private describes restricted reading in the World Bank and Wüst and Gervais frameworks. Besu's documentation and some vendors use private and permissioned as near synonyms. A public permissioned network is possible, so the labels cannot reliably substitute for an explicit account of read access, write access and governance.

What are examples of private blockchains in 2026?

Private blockchain examples in November 2026 include Kinexys' private-permissioned asset platform, HSBC's private deposit-token blockchain and DTCC's private Besu network. HSBC's service supports several currencies across six markets. DTCC's service launched on 28 October 2026 across its private network and public Canton. A company can therefore operate across more than one access model.

Is a private blockchain better than a database?

A private blockchain is not better than a database when there is only one writer, under either decision framework used here. It becomes relevant when mutually mistrusting organizations need shared state. The choice still depends on control, confidentiality and operating costs. An always-online trusted third party can suffice. A ledger does not establish an advantage over a shared database for the same workload.

Is a private blockchain decentralized or secure?

A private blockchain is not decentralized or secure by its label alone. Blockchain decentralization depends on control, including who holds validator keys and approves changes. One-company chains concentrate that authority. Known identities can support accountability, but do not prevent data disclosure or remove the need to trust operators. Security needs a description of the actual operating model. It is not automatically safer than public infrastructure.
Sources (34)

Get updates about blockchain, technologies and our company

We will process the personal data you provide in accordance with our Privacy policy. You can unsubscribe or change your preferences at any time by clicking the link in any email.

Follow us on social networks and don't miss the latest tech news

  • facebook
  • X
  • linkedin
  • instagram
Stay tuned and add value to your feed